Propulsion-Revolution - ASPS Designs and Builds Prototypes That Move Without Reaction Mass Ejection: PNN F432 - F432BA Demonstration Thrusters
image.jpeg
image.jpeg

CONTACTS

CONTACTS

FOLLOW ON

asps@asps.it

 

asps@asps.it

 


facebook
twitter
vimeo

Association for Space Propulsion Development

Privacy-policy

 

Cookie Policy

Association for Space Propulsion Development


PNN: the propellantless propulsion is better than ion propulsion and in Star4 configuration it is capable of taking off

There is a question that should be asked to modern astronautics:

 

why haven't we got yet bases on the Moon and Mars more than half a century after the historic endeavour?

 

The answer is no secret, but it has been sidelined and forgotten over time:

 

because the physics of the utilized propulsion system can only lose mass!

 

If we take the recent Artemis 1 mission as an example, we can easily see that, after a trip around the Moon without landing, only about 0.3% of the mass that left the launch pad returned to Earth, which means the remaining 99.7% is lost!
But also the fact that Mars has been for decades  the exclusive domain of exploration probes and robots demonstrates that it is simply not possible to transport human beings nor the enormous amount of materials that could ensure the existence of a permanent outpost or to even protect astronauts against the inevitable unforeseen events, not only on Mars but also on the Moon which is much closer to us.

An alternative propulsion cannot be built insisting on the Newtonian physics of rockets, but it can be built with physics that does not force to expel reaction mass to move.

Because whatever rocket is built it doesn't matter how big and impressive it is or even what type of conventional propulsion it uses: it cannot escape the limitations inherent in the thermodynamic law pV=nKT.
In other words if you want to, for example, double the fuel exhaust speed of a rocket engine, the temperature in the nozzle must inevitably be quadrupled.
But a rocket already struggles to withstand the 3,000 °C that are reached in the combustion chamber, a temperature of 12,000 °C is simply unattainable without melting the rocket.

 

That is: the speed of a rocket cannot be improved any further.

 

Any attempt in that direction is doomed to remain on paper, or to end with a spectacular and expensive bang (hopefully with no astronauts on board).

Today the development of truly alternative propulsion systems is essentially at a standstill because research seems to get lost in exotic theories that are closer to Star Trek than to the nature of the observed phenomenon.
So for an Emdrive which according to the creator works by exploiting radiation pressure, for other researchers hypothetical "recoils on virtual quantum substrates" come into play and so the possibility of understanding the phenomenon becomes close to zero and together with it the opportunity to obtain appreciable results.
Even the PNN does not escape such passage under the distorting lenses: if for ASPS the PNN exploits the Lorentz force, known for more than a century, for other researchers come into play hypotheses  that are surprising for their complexity but above all for their lack of solid foundations, being hypotheses based on phenomena that are often unproven and only theoretical. In short, other virtual quantum substrates



 

We are well aware that words are not enough to convince, that's why we offer the opportunity to attend the experimental tests of the PNN thruster and let the experimental evidence speak for itself.

Propulsion-Revolution - ASPS Designs and Builds Prototypes That Move Without Reaction Mass Ejection: PNN F432 - F432BA Demonstration Thrusters

Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet can

ASPS can demonstrate experimentally that the PNN surpasses all ion thrusters without expelling mass and that if powered in circumterrestrial orbit with electricity supplied by solar panels it is practically eternal and therefore can move all satellites and other types of payloads ad libitum


Propulsion-Revolution - ASPS Designs and Builds Prototypes That Move Without Reaction Mass Ejection: PNN F432 - F432BA Demonstration Thrusters

The only solution that can change this catastrophic state of affairs in current astronautics is PNN, propulsion without reaction mass ejection.

 

Our demonstrative prototypes want to swhow that it is possible to change the paradigm for a real conquest of space.

 

By connecting to this link or to

 

https://neolegesmotus.com/2020/10/29/pnn-has-been-disclosed/

 

you can learn the working principles of PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion)

 

Other links:

 

http://www.asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4

 

https://www.altpropulsion.com/events/apec-7-31-non-newtonian-em-propulsion-superconductors/

F432BA, in the photo, once brought into Earth orbit could reach Mars with only its batteries recharged by solar panels.

 

We accept collaborations and help that allow us to shorten the times of the following exploration and colonization program for both Moon and Mars.

The PNN propulsion allows the spaceship  to leave whole and return whole with a full load of minerals unlike Artemis 1 which only 0.3% of the spaceship made a single lap around the Moon while 99.7% of the dustbin (vector rocket) was lost.

 

Here is the timeline of PNN colonization program for the Moon and Mars:

 

Phase 0 : Appropriate preparatory tests with PNN thrusters and PNN Dynamo as operational electrical generator of the PNN

 

Phase 1 :  Deliver a PNN probe into Earth orbit with take-off from the ground and remotely controlled for C2 dynamics:  Command and Control of the PNN and in particular for tests on thrust, braking and attitude timing

 

Phase 2: Construction of a real manned spaceship to the Moon and Mars that allows the identification of the most suitable places to set permanent bases

 

Let believers in rockets continue in their ridiculous and illusory enterprises which for over half a century (Apollo 11) have been manifestly unable to even colonize the Moon, but instead they only produce film projects and media publicity of what they should do and are not realistically capable to do …. In addition to super fireworks (April 2023) of large dustbins like Starship passed off as successes.

maomao1.jpeg

Meanwhile, ASPS has recently created a protype composed of 24 PNN dipoles, visible in the photo on the left. 

This is one of the 24 configurations that would allow the system to take off if the UHF power supply was extended over time. With the current power supply, i.e. lithium batteries, this is not yet possible as they can power the system for a maximum of 3 minutes and have a very short life cycle.

 

Instead, powered by an adequate energy source, such as the 100kW version of the Kilopower reactor currently being tested at NASA, not only would take-off be possible but also a round trip from Mars, which compared to the duration with current means would be shortened by months if not years,  would require a maximum of ten days.

In the photo on the right the prototype stands on an industrial interest representative's scale for further measurements.

 

While the arm scale remains the best tool for measuring PNN thrust, this is the first third-party scale to measure violation of the Third Law of Dynamics.

 

It should be underlined that ASPS offers the interested party the possibility of carrying out autonomous measurements on the prototype with its own instruments.

pronscale.jpeg

ESSENTIAL NOTE: Those who really collaborate on this project will be able to experimentally see in ASPS Labs that we are not charlatans or rather that the basic elements for realizing it do actually work: PNN thrust and PNN dynamo as an electric generator. The large aerospace organizations that we have approached in the past have lost all the features that could help PNN so they are no longer needed. No one will prevent them from setting up bases on the Moon and Mars with the magnificent means at their disposal: rockets.

 

…and may the best win

 

With every little step forward of the PNN, its detractors try to muddy the waters with endless discussions, requests for tests in space (which can be avoided with excellent scales and adequate shielding), certifications made by people who cannot know something about PNN since its know-hos still has to be written and, in the absence of other excuses, criticisms on form before substance.

They often oppose other revolutionary technologies to PNN but they always omit that, unlike our technology:
 

  1. The physical law on which their reactionless propulsion should be based is always missing.
    Because there isn't... or rather: because they don't know the principles of the new non-Newtonian physics.
     
  2.  The inventors do not expose themselves, or the prototype is missing
     
  3. There is no clear and comprehensible description of their apparatus, apart from the usual verbose patent which is difficult to understand. A schematization seems impossible for them
     
  4. Fundamental: minimal experimentation with a wrapped, shielded and radio-controlled box of their apparatus on any scale in a terrestrial environment is missing

 

 

From 6 December 2023 all sales are suspended due to compliance with terms and conditions of sale. If you have any questions, please write to asps@asps.it

Those who will develop the PNN starting from our F432BA prototype which will soon be on sale together with the patent concessions, have in fact large sectors of maneuver in their experimental development and large profit margins because PNN fights against a propulsion system (the rocket) destined to fail over long distances due to intrinsic physical reasons.

To give a trivial example, the propulsion of rockets is like a car that has to carry the road on which to move. While the PNN, as described , must not transport anything since through the UHF Lorentz force applied to the open circuits it recoils on the VACUUM (which is not a vacuum because it has NOT zero dielectric constant and magnetic permeability!).

​PNN is also electromagnetic and NOT based on the chemistry of the fuels that propel rockets and currently its thrust surpasses ion propulsion

For the most incredulous, if you are reluctant to change your mind, you can see our experiments.


The tragic failure (14 astronauts deceased) and the scrapping of the Space Shuttle after about 30 years of launches have in fact taught nothing to those who are about to waste more time on the inevitably unsuccessful project called Artemis, which comically had to postpone the first launch several times given the complications due to the huge rocket employed.


Zero Point Energy Dynamo : energy from zero point

A collateral product to the PNN but built with the same principles is the ZPED  or Zero Point Energy Dynamo. The PNN will thus be totally non-polluting and eco-sustainable.

The ZPED is on sale in our E-Shop.

If you want to support ASPS to improve PNN you can make a donation via Paypal at the link below

Propulsion-Revolution - ASPS Designs and Builds Prototypes That Move Without Reaction Mass Ejection: PNN F432 - F432BA Demonstration Thrusters
Vezzo Grafico

OUR PRODUCTS

NewCondition 0.00
Pre-Order
zped-zero-point-energy-dynamo

NewCondition 0.00
Pre-Order
piem-pnn-international-expedition-to-mars

NewCondition 0.00
Pre-Order
theoretical-and-technical-assistance

NewCondition 0.00
Pre-Order
shares-of-pnn-patent shares-of-pnn-patent

NewCondition 0.00
Pre-Order
pnn-demonstration-space-thrusters pnn-demonstration-space-thrusters pnn-demonstration-space-thrusters pnn-demonstration-space-thrusters pnn-demonstration-space-thrusters

The site is always being updated and our products evolve both in terms of composition and costs and for various experimental needs they increase over time

 

 

News & Articles

PNN International Expedition on Mars (PIEM)

PNN International Expedition on Mars (PIEM)

author

2022-12-17 14:27

Switch to PNN to colonize the Moon and Mars

Stay Informed

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on all the news related to the electromagnetic propulsion system!

Create Website with flazio.com | Free and Easy Website Builder